Sensitive content on Ping.Sg: The shadowfox debate.
A Summary
So Shadowfox is anti-homosexuality. He thinks it’s unnatural, wrong, yada.
Priss started a campaign to “ban” him, stating that he has “compromised the integrity of the community”.
The mediaslut thinks that Priss should just get over it and let the poof mechanism weed offensive posts out itself.
Sicarii says Priss is being kinda hypocritical, claiming that she’s pointing fingers at Shadowfox for being intolerant.. when she *cough*.
———————
How ah like that? This kinda incident is something that would’ve eventually happened, given the many, many things that will offend many, many different groups of people. It’s just a matter of when. We have the pro-homosexuality, the anti-homosexuality, different races, different religoins different income groups, different education levels, different genders, the obese, the pro-life, the pro-choice… the list is endless lah.
Imagine the future “Shadowfoxes” and “Prisses”.
America is better than Singapore! Just look at our GDP!
Girls are just not meant to work.
Abortion will send your baby to Hell.. and YOU!
There are no poor people, there are just lazy people.
Why Hindus are better than Christians.
These are obviously controversial subjects, but what about borderline cases like maybe…
NTU hostel security guards should just die. All they do is sleep.
I mean, if security guards surf blogs, they could get very very offended… haha ahem. *disclaimer: I don’t actually think they should die. It’s just an example.
The point I’m trying to make here is that some people will have some points of view that will offend some other people a lot.
What is acceptable will ultimately depend on Ping.Sg’s level of tolerance, not Shadowfox, not Priss, not Mediaslut, nor Sicarii. After all, if enough people are riled up enough, they would un-pong it, and then poof it… Or Uzyn can choose to have some guidelines on what is acceptable, and what is not.
As for my stand on the gay issue. I’m fine with them. They can be nice people. And duh, they’re human beings too. But it’s undeniable that evolution will slowly eradicate homosexuality because they cannot reproduce. So erm, nature kinda didn’t really intend for us all (or most) to be homosexuals. If homosexuality gets to too large an extent, it will eventually mean the end of the human race. No one can dispute this… but this doesn’t mean we should treat them badly or discriminate. That’s another issue altogether.






about 2 years ago
Or people who support Obama should [insert whatever you want here..something bad]..lol..we can’t ban everything, but some things must ban..like porn blogs.
about 2 years ago
that’s the thing about blogs. Although each is entitled to his/her own opinions, whatever is written down may/will still affect others.
My blog being crappy has offended people before too.
I guess everything has its consequences.
about 2 years ago
Now that’s a good blog title -
“Wendy says homosexuals will end the human race”
about 2 years ago
My point exactly.
Priss should make use of the system in place to show her displeasure rather to call for a complete ban.
All it takes is one to poof or un-pong and the rest will follow!
about 2 years ago
@nocturne: Wendy didn’t say homosexuals will end the human race hor! She said that too many homosexuals will end the human race.
Unless they er, copulate with the opposite sex for the purpose of reproduction while continuing their relationships…?
Eh. -_-”
about 2 years ago
“No one can dispute this.”
about 2 years ago
Yah what… if there are too many homosexuals and they refuse to engage in heterosexual sex for the sake of continuing the human race then we will all just become kaput.
about 2 years ago
What it was is simply this: ??????
An IMO, that is summarize as: ” I can’t tolerate what is said and aha… let me denounce you first on the grounds that your views are intolerant (to justify my intolerance). “
about 2 years ago
Seems like your blog dun accept Chinese text.. The five ?s is: er ren xian gao zhuang.
about 2 years ago
Hai. Arguments are always blind lah.